Archived analysis

This page is old. 99acres (Info Edge India Ltd.) was reviewed on 2026-05-02.

This is a historical, policy-only review. Policies, product behavior and source URLs may have changed since this analysis was published.

For current public evidence from website trackers, policy findings and proof samples, go to State of Privacy 2026.

Real Estate

99acres (Info Edge India Ltd.)

Ready Score 47/100
Sushant Pasumarty
ANALYSIS SUPERVISED BY Sushant Pasumarty
📅 2 May 2026

Discuss this page with an LLM

99acres's privacy policy remains heavily anchored in the IT Act 2000 and the 2011 Privacy Rules. While it provides strong security disclosures, it fails major DPDP Act 2023 hurdles — specifically regarding granular consent, multi-language notice availability, and the specific rights of data principals (like nomination and DPB escalation). For a platform handling significant financial intent and PII, these gaps represent high regulatory risk.

How To Read This Analysis

This is an archived policy-only review of the company's public privacy policy. It is not a government certification and it is not legal advice.

For current public evidence from website trackers, policy findings and proof samples, see State of Privacy 2026.

We look for:

  • Notice and consent clarity
  • Purpose limitation
  • Data minimization
  • Retention and deletion language
  • Vendor and processor disclosures
  • Data Principal rights
  • Grievance redressal
  • Breach and security posture

Source Check

  • Source policy was reviewed for this archived analysis, but the old policy URL is not linked because public policy locations may have changed.
  • Date reviewed: 2026-05-02
  • Company: 99acres (Info Edge India Ltd.)
  • Readiness score: 47/100
  • Policies and product behavior may have changed since review
  • Whether the current source policy still matches this archived policy-only review
  • Whether app, web and product flows match the policy

What To Do With This

If your company has a similar data model, use this analysis as a warning map. Do not copy the score. Map your own data flow.

Ask internally:

  • Do we collect similar categories of personal data?
  • Do we share data with the same number or type of vendors?
  • Can users understand why their data is shared?
  • Can we prove deletion, retention and grievance workflows?
  • What evidence would we show if questioned?

If this analysis resembles your business model, the next step is not a better privacy-policy paragraph. It is a data map and gap analysis.

Book a DPDP readiness call

⚠️ Compliance Gaps

  • Consent is bundled with Terms of Use — fails Section 6 requirement for 'freely given' and 'unconditional' consent
  • No reference to the Data Protection Board (DPB) of India for grievance escalation
  • Notice not available in the 22 languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution (Section 5 requirement)
  • Retention policy is vague ('as long as necessary') — lacks automated erasure triggers upon purpose completion
  • Absence of 'Right to Nominate' under Section 14
  • No mechanism for verifiable parental consent for users under 18 (Section 9)

✅ Strengths

  • Clearly defined categories of personal and sensitive data collection
  • Explicit mention of the right to withdraw consent (though with service termination caveats)
  • Detailed security practices including procedural and electronic safeguards
  • Transparency regarding third-party sharing with banks and NBFCs for leads

Overview

99acres, operated by Info Edge (India) Ltd., is a premier real estate portal. Its data ecosystem is complex, involving the collection of PII (names, phone numbers), financial intent (home loan queries), and location data from buyers, sellers, and brokers. Under the DPDP Act 2023, 99acres qualifies as a Data Fiduciary and likely a Significant Data Fiduciary (SDF) due to its vast user base and the sensitivity of property-linked financial data.

DPDP Readiness: Section-by-Section Analysis

99acres follows a “Notice by Incorporation” model. The policy states: “By accessing or using 99acres, you agree to be bound by the terms… and privacy policy.”

DPDP Requirement: Consent must be a clear affirmative action that is free, specific, informed, and unconditional. Gap: The current “take it or leave it” bundled consent (where using the site implies acceptance of all data sharing, including with third-party NBFCs) is likely non-compliant. Users should be able to opt-out of marketing sharing while still accessing property listings. Furthermore, the notice is only provided in English, violating the Section 5 requirement for availability in 22 regional languages.

Section 8 — Obligations of Data Fiduciary ✅

The policy excels in describing its security posture. It mentions physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with Indian laws and industry standards to prevent unauthorized access.

Strength: Info Edge has historically maintained robust ISO-standard security controls, which aligns with Section 8’s mandate for “reasonable security safeguards.”

Section 9 — Processing Children’s Data 🔴

The policy has a dedicated “Children” section (Section 8 of their policy), stating the platform is not intended for users under 18. However, it lacks a mechanism to verify age or obtain verifiable parental consent.

DPDP Requirement: Fiduciaries must obtain verifiable parental consent before processing any child’s data and are prohibited from tracking or behavioral monitoring of children. Gap: As a public-facing portal with no age-gate, 99acres is currently at risk of processing minors’ data without DPDP-compliant verification.

Section 11 — Rights of Data Principal ⚠️

The policy identifies the rights to access, update, and erase data via a request to feedback@99acres.com.

DPDP Requirement: Principals have the right to access, correction/erasure, grievance redressal, and nomination. Gap: There is no mention of the Right to Nominate (Section 14), which allows a data principal to appoint a person to exercise their rights in case of death or incapacity.

Section 12 — Grievance Redressal 🔴

While a Grievance Officer is clearly listed with contact details, the escalation path is incomplete.

Gap: The DPDP Act requires fiduciaries to inform users that they can file a complaint with the Data Protection Board (DPB) if they are unsatisfied with the fiduciary’s response. This reference is entirely missing from the 99acres policy.

Section 13 & 14 — Data Retention ⚠️

Section 4 of the 99acres policy states data is kept “as long as it is necessary to provide you services.”

DPDP Requirement: Data must be erased once the purpose is fulfilled or consent is withdrawn. Gap: The “as long as necessary” language is too broad under the new Act. There are no defined timelines for when a “lead” (property query) is considered expired and should be purged from databases or shared third-party partner lists.

Section 16 — Cross-Border Transfers ⚠️

The policy notes that data may be transferred to service providers in other parts of the world.

Gap: Under Section 16, transfers are restricted to countries not “blacklisted” by the Central Government. 99acres lacks specific language committing to these transfer restrictions or explaining the safeguards used for international data flows beyond a general “reasonable steps” clause.

Risk Assessment

CategoryRisk LevelDPDP Violation Probability
Consent ArchitectureHighHigh (Bundled consent)
Notice ComplianceHighCritical (Missing 22 languages)
Data RetentionMediumHigh (Vague timelines)
Principal RightsMediumMedium (Missing Nomination)
Security ControlsLowLow (Robust existing framework)
Grievance RedressalHighHigh (Missing DPB reference)

Fix these compliance gaps today.

Book 1:1 Consultation >
Book clarity call